To Be or Not to Be? The Homer Announcer

mets broadcast

There’s an obvious difference between a national PxP sports broadcaster working for a big-time network and a local television or radio announcer. The difference, of course, is the fact that the national broadcaster (think Joe Buck, Al Michaels, Marv Albert) is supposed to stay neutral, giving equal time and excitement to both teams during a game.

The local broadcaster, on the other hand, does not hide behind a cloud of objectivity; rather, they make no secret of their hope for their team to win, and, for obvious reasons, devote more time and attention to that team. There are clear reasons behind this. For one, the broadcasters are often employees of the team, so if they are too harsh on their employer, they probably won’t last very long. The broadcasters are also playing to their audience, who is overwhelmingly going to be fans of that team.

For instance, Pat Hughes, radio PxP man for the Chicago Cubs, is going to yell louder when a Cubs player hits a home run as opposed to a Cardinals player because most people listening to the game on WGN are Cub fans.

But there is a line between pulling for a team and being an outright, obnoxious homer. Below are a couple examples of calls from announcers, both national and local. I want to know whether you feel any of them are too over the top in their excitement for the team, and whether the national broadcasters are being too objective (not showing any sort of passion).

John Sterling, Yankees’ Radio PxP Man:

Pat Hughes and Ron Santo during the ’98 season:

Marv Albert’s radio call of David Tyree’s great Super Bowl catch:

Hawk Harrelson’s call of a Mark Buerhle homerun:

A collection of NBA announcer Kevin Harlan’s best calls:

I actually don’t have a problem with a broadcaster favoring the team he announces; in fact, I prefer it when I am watching my local sports teams. As a fan, I want my announcer to share my passion for the team, without taking it too far. But if my team hits a three at the buzzer to win a game or a grand slam in the 11th inning to win, I want the announcer to go crazy just as I am.

But I don’t want the announcer saying “We are winning,” as Harrelson does. The announcer, even if he used to play, is not a member of the team, and thus has no business saying “We need some runs” or “The bad guys are winning.” That’s just plain amateurish.

My favorite broadcast team, though, might be what the New York Observer aptly named “The Anti Homers” crew of New York Mets’ television broadcasters. I have listened to these three a lot this summer, and find myself laughing out loud throughout the entire game. I highly recommend this article, which highlights all the reasons Gary Cohen, Keith Hernandez and Ron Darling make such a great team (hat tip: Whitehead).

The problem I have with some local announcers, such as Hawk Harrelson of the White Sox and John Sterling of the Yankees, is not their fanaticism for the team they broadcast; instead, it’s their gimmicks. I can’t stand “You can put it on the boaaarrrddd….YES!” I cringe when John Sterling goes into his “It is high, it is far” routine, only for the ball to land on the warning track. And, like everyone else, I can’t stand Chris Berman’s “Back, back, back.”

Genuine excitement is one thing. Gimmicks are another. Something simple like Marv Albert’s “Yes!” is fine with me, because it’s simple and pure and doesn’t sound forced.

Announcers don’t have to reinvent the wheel or spend their nights coming up with a catchphrase. I just want them to show some passion and let their calls come to them. Is that too much to ask?


5 responses to “To Be or Not to Be? The Homer Announcer

  1. What do you think of Michael Kay’s “See ya!”

    • Don’t have a problem with it. For one, he does it for both teams, so it’s not a “hometown gimmick.” It’s also not obnoxious. It’s not a 10 second long call that puts the attention on him. It’s a homerun call. In my mind, homerun calls are perfectly fine as long as they are short, generally a couple of words. Props to Michael Kay for monopolizing “See ya!” because no other announcer can now use that.

  2. See, I have no problem with a team’s announcers criticizing the team…to a point.

    Saying “In my opinion, Ankiel shouldn’t be starting, or Wellemeyer should be out of the rotation” is fine…don’t rip the front office and everything should be alright. It’s not like they’re rooting against those players. It’s just their opinion, which hopefully is better formed than ours because they SEE these players 170 days out of the year.

    On the other hand, the White Sox announcers are without peer in terms of awful homers. Never mind the terrible calls, but they blew a chance to go down in announcer history when Buehrle threw the perfect game. Instead of saying something classy, it was “YES, YES, YES” like they caught the ball at first base. It was embarrassing to watch.

  3. This is why you guys at WNUR are flawed. I never understand your elitist views of Hawk Harrelson. The guy is employed by the Sox. He was the general manager of the team (and sucked hard, so they told him he could sit in the booth and sound like an idiot). The thing with Hawk is that if you are a White Sox fan, the people that Comcast and WGN are trying to reach, you love Hawk. He will never be in the Hall of Fame, but he’s our Hawk. I tune in to listen to Hawk.

  4. I cannot believe I still get no love on this blog. How often do I rep Gary Cohen as the best PXP guy in the league? I also am in the process of making a t-shirt of Keith Hernandez’ recent on-air quote, “Kids, my best advice to all of you, is to not follow in my footsteps.”

    Back to Back and Belly to Belly,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s